“The U.K. called in assistance to help hunt for a foreign
submarine off the west coast of Scotland starting in late November.
Maritime patrol aircraft (MPAs) from
France, Canada and the U.S. conducted patrols in conjunction with British
surface warships in the search for the submarine in late November and the first
week of December, operating out of RAF
Lossiemouth in northern Scotland.
The incident began when a periscope was
sighted in waters where U.K. and other submarines would normally surface as
they head into or out of the Royal Navy’s
submarine base at Faslane, home of the U.K.’s ballistic missile submarines.
At the height of the operation, aircraft
involved in the hunt included two U.S. Navy P-3 Orions, a single CP-140 Aurora
from the Royal Canadian Air Force and a Dassault
Atlantique 2 of the French navy. Also involved was one of the U.K.’s Raytheon Sentinel radar-reconnaissance aircraft.”
Osborne goes on to note the fact
that a Russian SAG transited the English Channel during roughly the same
period. Certainly seems like a bit of ‘back to the future.’
I’m actually rather amazed that
this sub hunt hasn’t garnered more attention in the U.S. A quick Google search
reveals several short articles by the BBC and some British papers, a short
article in Newsweek, and a short article by Reuters that all essentially copy
the original Aviation Week report. In comparison, the major U.S. media outlets reliably
carry reports whenever NATO members scramble fighters to intercept Russian ‘out
of area’ aircraft sorties…which appear to be occurring at least once a week of
late.
Given that what just occurred off
Faslane is an order of magnitude more strategically significant (and
provocative) in nature than fighter intercepts, and considering the ‘plausible
deniability’ it affords all the involved parties, it is understandable that
neither the British government nor any of the supporting allies would want to talk
much about it. The possibility that a ‘foreign submarine’ stalked the waters
just outside the home of Britain’s nuclear deterrent force, though, is a pretty
big deal. I get that visuals of sleek NATO fighters flying alongside large
Russian bombers make for glossier news stories than visuals of frigates,
helicopters, and MPA burning holes in the ocean searching for something that
can’t be seen. Nevertheless, Sweden’s sub hunt off Stockholm in October got a
lot of notice in the American press, so reporting on real-world ASW operations
in a major ally’s most sensitive waters is hardly unprecedented this fall.
Given that the British presently
lack their own MPA capability, perhaps they might be
interested in providing ‘places’ for U.S. Navy MPA aircraft to rotationally
deploy over the near-term? If ‘foreign submarine visits’ in or near British
waters are going to be more frequent (and there’s every reason to think this
will be the case), then there ought to be an emerging British demand for
quick-response wide-area MPA. The gain for the U.S. would be twofold: a
high-visibility demonstration of allied solidarity, and potential opportunities
for aircrews to get real-world search experience (and ideally some contact time
to boot). Probably wouldn’t be a bad idea for the U.S. and Royal Navies to
conduct a few combined arms ASW exercises in the North Atlantic or North Sea
during 2015, either.
No comments:
Post a Comment