Wednesday, August 12, 2024

Swarms for Defense at Sea



U.S. Navy automated units testing

The specter of the “Killer Robot” seems to be the first thought in the minds of many when the potential of automated military systems is discussed. Whether today’s terrorist targeting drone aircraft, the murderous machines of science fiction, or the insect-like fearsome package-deliverers of the advertising world, the era of unmanned combat terrifies many in the general public. Less explored, however, are the defensive concepts for the employment of swarm technology. Many such concepts could be put to use in naval warfare for scouting at sea, the defense of warships, the management of battle damage, and treatment of wounded sailors. Emerging swarm technology in all of these areas could make defense at sea less costly and more efficient, save damaged ships, and especially the lives of highly trained 21st century sailors.
DASH (Gyrodyne Inc)
            The U.S. Navy has already made significant investment in automated scouting in the form of air and surface drones. The Navy pioneered such a mission with the Drone Antisubmarine Helicopter (DASH) in the mid 1960’s in order to arm small combatants with a rotary wing antisubmarine warfare capability.[1] While DASH was not an overall success, it paved the way for future development of rotary wing drone aircraft including the present Fire Scout. Similarly the Navy has experimented with a number of unmanned surface vehicles for both scouting and combat. In August 2014, a formation of such ships was demonstrated in a James River exercise.[2] These platforms were organized as an autonomous swarm to interrogate and potentially attack surface-based opponents. They might resemble the Defense Advanced Research Projects Administration (DARPA) Antisubmarine Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV).[3] Armed with a variety of submarine, surface, and anti-air/missile payloads connected to battle force networks, such units could form a protective, unmanned ring around conventional warships.
            Individual ships could also benefit from very small swarming units for self defense and repair of battle damage. The size of swarm-capable drone vehicles continues to decrease while still supporting substantial computing capability. Very small swarming vehicles may eventually cover parts of a ship’s external structure and be utilized for a variety of missile defense tasks. They could be supported from a number of external points in a fashion similar to the distribution of counter-measure wash down nozzles. Once launched from these nodes, small, reusable drone units might use swarm tactics to create a re-deployable chaff cloud, drop flares, and eventually create defensive barriers against some cruise missiles. A swarm-based cruise missile defense deployed by the host ship on a known threat bearing might offer the possibility of engaging cruise missile “leakers” that the ship’s traditional or future directed energy defenses fail to kill.
            Ships might also benefit from internal swarms for conducting firefighting and other damage control efforts. A drone swarm released into a damaged compartment aboard a ship can quickly map the scene, identify personnel casualties to be evacuated, and prioritize damage much faster than a human investigator.[4] Google’sProject Tango may be the first step in the creation of such a swarm unit.[5] Such small swarm units might be a better choice for shipboard damage control than larger, humanoid firefighters currently under development.[6] While one robot firefighter might be disabled by follow-on battle damage and create a significant gap in unmanned capability, a swarm of robots might be continuously replaced if degraded. Other swarm units might deploy remote damage control monitoring sensors, firefighting agents, and even swarm together to create a patch, or secure a watertight door or hatch.
            The large crews of past warships were present to not only operate installed weapons and propulsion systems but also to conduct damage control. The ongoing reduction of shipboard personnel makes this crew mission more difficult to practice. Reduction in crew size must be accompanied by increases in automated damage control measures. The drone swarm represents a pragmatic solution to this problem in that one drone frame could support multiple, modular damage control payloads. Such a drone force on a ship with a small crew might help that vessel recover from damage faster than reliance on a small crew alone would allow.
Artist Conception of ACTUV
            None of these advances in swarm technology are immediately available, and achieving them will require significant investment. The problems they would address, however, will only grow more challenging over time. Present budgets will support fewer manned warships than in the past.[7] Adopting some variant of ACTUV in large numbers might allow the U.S. Navy to move some of its offensive and defensive capabilities to battle force unmanned ships and increase the overall size and combat power of the surface force. The cruise and ballistic missile threats continue to increase. Development of a potential swarm “shield” over manned surface ships may improve their survivability against missile attack. Finally, warship crew size is unlikely to increase. The reduction in shipboard personnel demands an increase in flexible, automated damage control capabilities to replace those manual capabilities lost with shrinking crews. Defensive swarm applications such as these should be explored to improve survivability of both ships and the talented and expensive personnel who man them now and in the future.




[1] http://www.gyrodynehelicopters.com/dash_history.htm
[2] http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2014/10/inside-navys-secret-swarm-robot-experiment/95813/
[3] http://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsdarpa-seeks-test-ready-multi-sensor-approaches-for-actuv-programme-4542407
[4] http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3600/1/JAdvRobPenders.pdf
[5] https://www.google.com/atap/project-tango/
[6] http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/12/tech/mci-saffir-robot/
[7] http://www.hudson.org/research/11143-our-navy-is-getting-dangerously-smaller-and-no-one-is-paying-attention

No comments:

layModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML4', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML4'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_BlogArchiveView', new _WidgetInfo('BlogArchive1', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('BlogArchive1'), {'languageDirection': 'ltr', 'loadingMessage': 'Loading\x26hellip;'}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML2', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML2'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML1', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML1'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML3', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML3'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_AttributionView', new _WidgetInfo('Attribution1', 'footer-3', document.getElementById('Attribution1'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); layModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML4', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML4'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_BlogArchiveView', new _WidgetInfo('BlogArchive1', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('BlogArchive1'), {'languageDirection': 'ltr', 'loadingMessage': 'Loading\x26hellip;'}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML2', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML2'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML1', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML1'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_HTMLView', new _WidgetInfo('HTML3', 'sidebar-right-1', document.getElementById('HTML3'), {}, 'displayModeFull')); _WidgetManager._RegisterWidget('_AttributionView', new _WidgetInfo('Attribution1',