Monday, February 23, 2024

Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group Deployment

The Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group deployed over the weekend, and if the news reports are accurate the ship is being deployed to the Middle East to, among other things, fight pirates. The Eisenhower CSG is made up of the following ships:
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69)
USS Gettysburg (CG 64)
USS Vicksburg (CG 69)
USS Bainbridge (DDG 96)
USS Halyburton (FFG 40)
USNS Big Horn (T-AO 198)
USNS Sacagawea (T-AKE 2)
Also getting mention as part of the deployment is the USS Stout (DDG 55). News reports are suggesting the ship will be deploying at a later date. It is unclear why the USS Stout (DDG 55) is delayed in deployment, but it is noteworthy that USS Stout (DDG 55) is one of two AEGIS ballistic missile defense ships on the East coast, the other being the USS Ramage (DDG 61) currently forward deployed with the Iwo Jima CSG.

There are currently two strike groups forward deployed to the Middle East region (5th Fleet AOR), the Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group and the Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group. The TRCSG deployed September 8th, 2008 while the Iwo Jima ESG deployed on August 6th, 2008. The Pacific based Boxer ESG deployed back in early January and is in the Indian Ocean, and should replace the Iwo Jima ESG sometime over the next week or two, and the Eisenhower CSG should arrive to the 5th Fleet region sometime in late March to relieve the Roosevelt CSG.

Also forward deployed at this time is the Stennis CSG in the Pacific, which made news last month when it was revealed the strike group was carrying a large number of modern helicopters, which one would presume is to fight piracy. That was before North Korea decided to test the patience of the new administration.

The Eisenhower CSG deployment is unusual. This is the first time an east coast Carrier Strike Group has deployed in the first 6 months of the year since the George Washington (CVN 73) carrier strike group deployed to the Middle East in January 2004 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Over the past 5 years, carrier strike groups would deploy from the Pacific theater in the first 6 months of the year while the Atlantic fleet carriers would deploy in the last 6 months of the year, but this deployment breaks that pattern.

While the Eisenhower CSG deployment appears aligned with schedule, it does highlight the difficulties the Navy is facing in regards to keeping East coast aircraft carrier availability up. The Navy currently lists six aircraft carriers on the East coast; USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70), USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), and USS Enterprise (CVN 65); however numbers are decieving. The USS Enterprise (CVN 65) will not complete its current extended docking availability until at least August. The USS Carl Vison (CVN 70) is still undergoing her nuclear refueling downtime, which will keep the ship unavailable throughout the rest of the year. While there was good news from the builders trials of the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), the ship was commissioned before she was ever tested at sea, and will not actually be available to the fleet for her first deployment until either late 2010 or early 2011.

The results mean the east coast actually only has three aircraft carriers available, and with the deployment of USS Eisenhower (CVN 69) to replace USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), two of those three aircraft carriers are currently on deployment. That leaves only the USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) on the east coast available, and that is somewhat misleading as well, since it was only last week that USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) completed its first sea trials after being in the drydock for 7 months. In other words, it will be no sooner than 6 months before Truman is ready to deploy again based on traditional training schedules.

Sunday, February 22, 2024

Taking Chance

Taking Chance was very good. Kevin Bacon was excellent. I still highly recommend the back story to the movie that started it all if you haven't read it yet. Here is the trailer if somehow you are not familiar with the movie.



There are some particularly good scenes in this movie. The first scene to really stand out for me was the first drive to the Airport with the body with the young driver who claims to be "too chicken shit" to sign up for the war but wanted to do his part anyway. I thought it was a great scene, two very different type of people with two very different point of views, and yet it is also that contrast that makes this country great in my opinion. The other scene that really captures not only the essence of the story but the emotion of the movie was the encounter with the other escort at the airport. It all comes together when it is revealed the SGT is escorting his brother.

Maybe it is because I am from a small town in a southern state, but I thought the casting for the movie was excellent. The funeral director guy who knows the family but doesn't know the kid was familiar to me, the airline employees including the pilot who remembers the names of all the escorts were excellent in representation, and the various people represented at the VFW... HBO did a really good job casting this movie and it is represented in the quality of the film.

BlackFive has a comment thread up with some new, extra information. That is probably the best place to discuss the movie for those who desire, so I'm going to send people there and disable the comments for this specific post.

Thinking About Mission Modules

I've been reviewing the Military Times panoramic photography and my own photography thinking about mission modules on the LCS. In particular, I'm interested in mission modules other than the three the Navy is working on, indeed my considerations have been in regards to what a Coast Guard mission module is.

A Coast Guard mission module would give the Coast Guard a rapid deploy global capability to any LCS in the world, IF it can support the core requirements of 2 H-60s, 2 USVs, 1 Long Range Interceptor (LRI), and 1 Short Range Prosecutor (SRP). The requirements aren't space, there is plenty of space on the LCS for the gear. The challenge is overcoming the manpower issues.

For those that don't know, the LCS has the following modular capabilities:
Two sea type 1 stations: 12.2x3.5 m.
Two sea type 2 stations: 7.1x2.6 m.
Two aviation type 1 stations: 13.1x 3.4 m.
Three onboard weapon stations
One support Type 2: 3.05x2.44 m
Nine Support Type 1: ISO containers
One sensor station (classified)
Essentially the sea type 1 stations are 11m systems like the LRI while the sea type 2 stations are 7m systems like the SRP. The way I see it the Coast Guard system side module would be one sea Type 1 module (LRI), one sea Type 2 module (SRP), three aviation type type 1 stations (one would have to be stored below deck) supporting 2 H-60s and 3 Fire Scouts, and 2 ISO containers with 8 man berthing w/ toilet for the LEDET detachments.

40 core crew, 23 aviation crew, and 12 module crew is the core layout as I understand it. The 12 module crew would shift to aviation to meet the additional H-60 requirement, while the 2 eight man berthing units would supply 16 for the LRI and SRP. Anyone see any problems, or have any suggestions?

If you recall, I spoke to RADM Blore about the LCS being a consideration for the Offshore Patrol Cutter program. I wasn't very excited about it, but he is under pressure to look at it. Regardless of whether the OPC uses a LCS hull or not, the idea that the Coast Guard should have a mission module is still very appealing to me. Considering the space of the LCS and the requirements of the Coast Guard for 2 H-60s, 2 UAVs, a LRI, and a SRP for the NSC.., if there were better manpower capabilities on the LCS a CG mission module could actually deploy all of those CG assets plus USVs for port security etc... which comes to more than the National Security Cutter can actually deploy. Just saying...

5th Fleet Focus: Order of Battle

Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group

USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71)
USS Monterey (CG 61)
USS The Sullivans (DDG 68)
USS Mason (DDG 87)
USS Nitze (DDG 94)
USNS Supply (T-AOE 6)


Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group

USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7)
USS San Antonio (LPD 17)
USS Carter Hall (LSD 50)
USS Vella Gulf (CG 72) (CTF-151)
USS Roosevelt (DDG 80)
USS Ramage (DDG 61)
USS Hartford (SSN 768)


EU NAVFOR

HS Psara (F454) - Command
FGS Rheinland-Pfalz (F 209)
FS Floréal (F730)
FS Commandant Ducuing (F795)
HMS Northumberland (F238)
SPS Victoria (F 82)


In Theater

Ocean 6
HDMS Absalon (L16)
RFS Pyotr Veliky (BCGN 099)
RFS Admiral Vinogradov (DDG 572)
RFS Yamal (BDK 156)
RFS Azov (BDK 151)
FGS Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (F 218)
FS Jeanne d'Arc (R97)
FS Georges Leygues (D640)
FS Jean-de-Vienne (D643)
FS La Boudeuse (P683)
FS Var (A608)
FS Saphir (S602)
TCG Giresun (F 491) (CTF-151)
HMS Portland (F79) (CTF-151)
HMS Richmond (F239)
HMAS Warramunga (FFH 152)
KD Sri Inderapura (L 1505)
KD Lekiu (F30)
KD Sri Indera Sakti (A1503)
KD Mahawangsa (A1504)
INS Tabar (F44)
INS Beas (F24)
HMS Al Riyadh (812) (RSNF)
HMS Makkah (814) (RSNF)
HMS Al Dammal (816) (RSNF)
PLAN Haikou (D171)
PLAN Wuhan (D169)
PLAN Weishanhu (A887)
USS Mahan (DDG 72) (CTF-151)
USS Scout (MCM 8)
USS Gladiator (MCM 11)
USS Ardent (MCM 12)
USS Dexterous (MCM 13)
USS Typhoon (PC 5)
USS Sirocco (PC 6)
USS Chinook (PC 9)
USS Firebolt (PC 10)
USS Whirlwind (PC 11)
USCGC Baranof (WPB 1318)
USCGC Maui (WPB 1304)
USCGC Adak (WPB 1333)
USCGC Aquidneck (WPB 1309)
USCGC Wrangell (WPB 1332)
USCGC Monomoy (WPB 1326)
HMS Atherstone (M38)
HMS Chiddingfold (M37)
HMS Grimsby (M108)
HMS Pembroke (M107)
USNS Tippecanoe (T-AO 199)
USNS Lewis and Clark (T-AKE 1)
USNS Catawba (T-ATF 168)
RFA Wave Knight (A386)
RFA Diligence (A132)
RFA Cardigan Bay (L3009)
JS Ariake (DD 109)
JS Towada (AOE 422)

*Fotiy Krylov - Russian fleet Tug
*Boris Butoma - Russian Boris Chilikin class fleet oiler
*Pechenga - Russian Dubna class oiler

Twitter Comment Thread

Twitter log from the previous week.
# Blogspot acting up, can't even see my own blog this morning 8:21 AM Feb 19th from web

# PLA Navy doing good things off Somali coast. Check out the photo album too. http://tinyurl.com/al98q2 9:23 PM Feb 18th from web

# Eisenhower CSG Deploys on Saturday. http://tinyurl.com/dcobc4 9:20 PM Feb 18th from web

# S-3 retired? Not when it can fill existing roles... http://tinyurl.com/d5mrds 9:13 PM Feb 18th from web

# Sexy Navy Picture of the Day... Part 2 http://tinyurl.com/c4eu5b 12:06 AM Feb 18th from web

# Sexy Navy Picture of the Day http://tinyurl.com/be7wzq 12:05 AM Feb 18th from web

# Stratfor speculates PLA Navy Carrier Fleet Plans http://tinyurl.com/aaprr9 12:00 AM Feb 18th from web

# Navy Contracts for Electromagnetic Railgun http://tinyurl.com/d3g5gn 11:52 PM Feb 17th from web

# Yankee Sailor returns. http://www.yankeesailor.us/ 11:51 PM Feb 17th from web

# News of the Wierd: Middle East Edition http://tinyurl.com/b3bhhh Sometimes the news isn't really news at all 10:02 PM Feb 17th from web

# @AFPAA That is very impressive. In social media, that is called "mass" for moving discussion topics. 11:09 AM Feb 17th from web in reply to AFPAA

# Saudi Navy thwarts Pirate attack. http://tinyurl.com/bp477m 12:13 AM Feb 17th from web

# This blog is new, excellent, and worth a look. http://tinyurl.com/bde24x 12:06 AM Feb 17th from web

# European Ballistic Missile Submarines involved in Collision in Mid-Atlantic http://tinyurl.com/crgwf6 11:34 PM Feb 15th from web

# @thomas_wiegold OK that was funny! Clearly they have global reach too 11:02 AM Feb 14th from web in reply to thomas_wiegold

# @BostonMaggie I guess I'm popular with the Czech Army. I dunno, been getting visits from that page. Its all part of my Global Reach Strategy 10:43 AM Feb 14th from web in reply to BostonMaggie

# @southcomwatch This should be your strategic concept http://tinyurl.com/bsmrby This is the rest of my advice http://tinyurl.com/ccmxs2 10:41 AM Feb 14th from web in reply to southcomwatch

# Information Dissemination is linked from a Czech Army unit. http://tinyurl.com/b3kxbv 10:16 AM Feb 14th from web

# @WyldDarkHeart Right on. That is brilliant reporting from Afghanistan. http://tinyurl.com/db29ds 10:12 AM Feb 14th from web in reply to WyldDarkHeart

# @US_EUCOM See Navy.mil for example of corporate style (dropdown), EUCOM is entertainment style (popup). On Navy.mil nothing blocks content 10:10 AM Feb 14th from web in reply to US_EUCOM

# @US_EUCOM Move your mouse around the page and watch everything popup and crowd the screen. You dont want that stuff blocking your content 9:04 AM Feb 14th from web

# @US_EUCOM content is king, so youre good there. Everything is a pop-up though. You already have a dynamic page without all the popups. 9:03 AM Feb 14th from web in reply to US_EUCOM
Add Galrahn to your Twitter account here. Add Galrahn's Twitter account to your RSS feed here. This post is the new Twitter comment thread. The link to the Twitter comment thread is below the Twitter entries on the right side of the blog.