Wednesday, December 28, 2024

Open Source Maritime UAVs and the Evolution of a Non-State Navy


The Sea Shepherds continue their campaign against Japanese whaling “research” vessels this Antarctic summer. New this year are enhanced ISR capabilities,with the introduction of two hand-launched UAVs. One of the Osprey UAVs, named after the Jerseylicious daughter of the recycling mogul who donated it, has already been deployed successfully against the whaling fleet.

The UAVs, roughly modeled after the proven Scan Eagle design, were developed by a small company in Wichita, Kansas. Performance stats on this SUAS aren’t available, but a range estimate of less than 100 miles is likely, given indications of 1-2 hour endurance and 75 MPH speed on various websites. The system flies with a commercially available $2300 GPS-enabled autopilot, but video and telemetry transmission limitations probably result in a much shorter working range (only 10KM from the ship by one source), resulting in an overall range much less than Bob Barker’s embarked Hughes MD500 helo. Still, the increased sensor height greatly extends the ship’s ability to scout for the Japanese whalers when the helo isn’t flying due to crew rest or weather issues. The Ospreys provide the Sea Shepherds with full motion HD video or digital stills and the website’s reference to “detection equipment” may refer to some sort of SIGINT/radio detection payload. These sorts of smallish drones tend to crash frequently for various reasons, especially when flown by inexperienced operators, so we should expect this year’s use of UAVs to be short-lived unless additional spares become available.

The adoption of much more sophisticated (and expensive) ship-launched UAVs such as the Scan Eagle or Siebel S-100 would be needed to really take the Sea Shepherd’s airborne scouting capabilities to the next level. Though given readily available and inexpensive R/C aircraft turned open-source naval UAS such as the Osprey, other non-state maritime actors, many of which are less-benign in intent than the SSCS, may soon adopt UAVs as reconnaissance tools for terror attacks or to avoid navies conducting counter-smuggling operations.

ISR improvements are just one component of the Sea Shepherd’s evolution. The table below (compiled from various web sources) is an attempt to illustrate the changing nature of Sea Shepherd’s capabilities over the past eight anti-whaling campaigns in the Southern Ocean. Note, SSCS’s history dates back much further from the 1970s, and the organization has been involved in many other sea-life defense campaigns, but the annual “Whale Wars” remain their most highly publicized effort.


Also noteworthy are the Japanese whalers' evolving tactics, which include smoke screens, stun grenades, ramming, water cannon, LRADs, and their own information operations campaign.

The opinions and views expressed in this post are those of the author alone and are presented in his personal capacity. They do not necessarily represent the views of U.S. Department of Defense, the US Navy, or any other agency.

Saturday, December 24, 2024

House Acts on Superferry's

From here:
SEC. 1015. TRANSFER OF CERTAIN HIGH-SPEED FERRIES TO THE NAVY.

(a) Transfer From MARAD Authorized- The Secretary of the Navy may, subject to appropriations, from funds available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2012, provide to the Maritime Administration of the Department of Transportation an amount not to exceed $35,000,000 for the transfer by the Maritime Administration to the Department of the Navy of jurisdiction and control over the vessels as follows:

(1) M/V HUAKAI.

(2) M/V ALAKAI.

(b) Use as Department of Defense Sealift Vessels- Each vessel transferred to the Department of the Navy under subsection (a) shall be administered as a Department of Defense sealift vessel (as such term is defined in section 2218(k)(2) of title 10, United States Code).

Thursday, December 22, 2024

Noteworthy Message Traffic

Picked this up from the public broadcast, issued last night as an ONI Special Advisory.
REPORTS FROM MARITIME FORCES AND COMMERCIAL MARITIME INTERESTS INDICATE CONCERN WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR LOCALIZED DISRUPTION TO SHIPPING IN CONJUNCTION WITH FUTURE IRANIAN NAVAL EXERCISES. DURING PREVIOUS EXERCISES IRANIAN MARITIME FORCES CONDUCTED BOARDINGS AND INSPECTIONS OF MERCHANT SHIPS, INCLUDING THOSE FLAGGED TO EUROPEAN NATIONS. THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT IRAN WILL ATTEMPT TO CONDUCT BOARDINGS AND INSPECTIONS DURING EXERCISES BETWEEN DECEMBER 2011 AND MARCH 2012. THE MOST LIKELY LOCATION FOR THIS ACTIVITY WOULD BE IN THE VICINITY OF THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ, PARTICULARLY IN AREAS CLOSER TO IRANIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS.

Tuesday, December 20, 2024

AirSea Battle, Budget Crunches, and Organizations

Now that all four Services will have representation in the AirSea Battle Office, one is forced to consider the possibiilty that this new organization potentially overlaps with one already in existence.  To that end, I offer the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Office (JIAMDO), formerly known as the Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Organzation (JTAMDO).  By way of full disclosure, I worked at JTAMDO for three years from 2001-2004.

Staffed by officers from the four services (with heavy emphasis on those elements of the Joint force most in play in AirSea Battle, including air and missile defense, electronic warfare and attack operations), JIAMDO already provides a Joint venue for the coordination and integration of DOTMLP-F.  Additionally, JIAMDO is the primary Joint organization responsible for interoperability/management of data links and networks that are critical to the kinds of things ASB seeks to do.  Never a big favorite of the Services, JTAMDO/JIAMDO played the role of honest broker in reviewing Service plans, wielding Joint authority to attempt to ensure IAMD was "organized, trained and equipped" as an ensemble.  Additionally, JIAMDO/JTAMDO stewards a number of highly classified capabilities also likely to be important in an A2AD environment.

What doesn't JIAMDO have?  It doesn't work all aspects of A2AD (anti-surface, anti-submarine in particular).  But rather than build an organization whose work is largely done by another already in existence, why not "subsume" JIAMDO as the nucleus of the ASBO and supplement it with SME's from the capability areas not already covered?  I'm sure there are enormously important bureaucratic reasons why this is downright impossible, but in an era of constrained resources, should we be starting up an office from the get-go that overlaps another's AOR? 

Bryan McGrath